For this assignment I attended Carnegie Hall s production of Stravinsky s mental strain orchestra of smatter . The following will discuss each of these pieces each and father my personal opinion rough being an prompt attender in the audiencehttp /www .nehrlich .com /chorus /stravinsky .htmlStravinskyThe symphony begins with an fast overture . Before the piece of euphony began I though I would be a everyday tender , discerniblely enjoying being at a cultural event . The institutionalize in which Stravinsky captures the audience with the harmony stochasticity and then the galling consonance with the string instruments and the pinch was breathtaking . After the starting motor second , I was no longer a day-after-day hearer , but active , non referential because the music did non move me of anything perso nal in my life , and non critical because I was in too much astonishment to think about the tonality and pitch and whether or not the instruments were in descent , but definitely an active listener oddly with the melody of the piano and the chorus harmony with the orchestraWith the debut of the second exploit s fighting(a)s and the pianissimo of the orchestra and the melody of the flutes , the pitches and the flip-flop between the consonance and dissonance was subtle Stravinsky s genius of contour line was made apparent to me in the second movement , especially in generator to the melody , the light airy find out that was quiesce somehow haunting coupled with the harmony and the fugue that takes drive between the different orchestral instruments (the strings and the flute and their coincidental combination which gave a definite melodic labyrinthine smack to the second movementThe third movements choral focus and the regular card of the music with the voices was chilling .
The tones of voices matched with consonance with the orchestra , and this stability along with the adagio was what caught my interest as a listener . Although Stravinsky wrote this piece not to be a symphony with sings but the psalm being symphonized , the chorus would not have been as ever-changing . Also , as a listener , it was not the sing that necessarily drew me into the music I had no intension of events to associate with the symphony , and therefore I would consider myself an absolutistic to some degree because the music stands solid on its give without the background association it has to the psalm . Although historically , the Sy mphony of the Psalms had personal relevance to Stravinsky who finished the piece on July 17 1930 , and he confessed to having written in relation to man s shackle with God and the ultimate truth , for me as a listener , I was caught up in the musical interpretation of what seemed to be beauty pain , as well as a haunting quality to the music that has to do with the tempo , and the schmooze between the orchestral instruments...If you want to get a gigantic of the mark essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment