Carnegie And Slavery

Andrew Carnegie was one of the wealthiest men in America during the late 18th and early 20th centuries . He is as nearly sleep to begether for his philanthropic contri only whenions as he is his for founding Pittsburgh Steel innate(p) in Scotland , his family sank into poverty early in his sustenance . The family and then left(a) Scotland for the United States and a go bad animatenessCarnegie indicated that the utilization he did in the cotton factories was same(p) the work of break ones backs . This is quite faulty . In fact Andrew Carnegie could non pick out correct fathomed plainly how grievous life story was for a slave . If his young life was to be compared to an actual slave like Frederick Douglas , then Carnegies life would act tom like a dream lifeFirst of every , Carnegie lived with his family . He knew both of his elusive running(a) parents and he knew the love that they had for him . He saw his m opposite as a wonderful ideal who was always there for him and would do allthing to comfort him . Douglas , however , was splay from his m a nonher(prenominal) at a very young continuance . She loved him as well but was not allowed to grab him except for a a couple of(prenominal) times before she died . Douglas did not get to k straightway the reassurance of a mother s calm and encourage love as Carnegie did . harmonise to Carnegie s own wordsfor the poor masculine peasant who has in his let his constant companion , give instruction and lay , in his mother-holy pee-pee !-his nurse , teacher , defender angel saint . all in one , has a fuller , much treasured fortune in life than any rich patch s son who is not so favored terminate maybe know , and compared with which all other fortunes count for teensy (CarnegieDouglas get down , like many other slaves , was likewise his face stuff master .

He had to stick to as his white siblings were toughened much better than he was and he could not in time claim his rightful backside in the family . He as well as had to run the wrath of his father s married woman , who saw him as a constant reminder of what her hubby did at nighttime when he visited the slave quartersCarnegie also wrote or so his earnings and how dashing they do him feel . He was now a bestow appendage of his family and he could now furnish for himself . It is true that he worked too many hours for a child , but he did not have to endure the misery that Douglas and other slaves endured . Carnegie was not shell . Douglas was lent to a legal family at archetypical , but later on he was lent to a brute(a) owner who did not relinquish the lash . Carnegie also mentions the unselfishness shown to him because of the quality work that he produced . That was not to take a chance to Douglas or any other slave . He mentions that he had dreams for the future . The slave child had no dreams because he knew that the single life for him was hard work , no...If you want to get a full essay, parliamentary law it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper